The transparent alternative to Zacks.
Zacks hands you a proprietary rank and research reports. FinMav lets you screen on your own criteria — describe what you want in plain English, get ranked results, and see every filter it applied. 3,000+ companies, 100+ metrics, no black box.
See it in action↓
Filtered for dividend growers with low leverage, healthy free cash flow, and payout ratios under 60%.
Yield 3.0%, payout 60%, D/E 0.42 — defensive payer with reliable FCF.
4.2% dividend growth, payout 58% — durable consumer cash machine.
2.9% yield, FCF Yield 4.2% — payout safe but D/E above target.
Click to try this search yourself
FinMav vs Zacks, feature by feature
Zacks leads with proprietary analyst-driven research. FinMav rebuilds screening around plain English and transparency — so you define the criteria and see exactly how they were applied.
| Capability | FinMav AI screener · transparent | Zacks Analyst research & ratings |
|---|---|---|
| Natural-language screening | ||
| Shows the exact filters it applied | ||
| Screen on your own criteria, not a fixed model | ||
| Explains ambiguous terms | ||
| Dropped-constraint warnings | ||
| Auto result audit / Screen Critic | ||
| No complex filter UI to learn | ||
| Generous free tier (no signup) | ||
| 100+ screening metrics | ||
| Full US stock coverage | ||
| Proprietary analyst rank (Zacks Rank) |
Comparison reflects core screening capabilities as of 2026. Not investment advice.
Why self-directed investors choose FinMav over Zacks
Keep Zacks for its ratings if you value them — reach for FinMav when you want to run your own transparent screens.
You control the screen, not a black-box rank
Zacks centers on the Zacks Rank — a proprietary model built around analyst earnings-estimate revisions. FinMav lets you define exactly what matters to you in plain English and ranks results on your criteria, with every filter shown.
It shows its work
Instead of a single opaque score, FinMav surfaces the parameters it applied, explains ambiguous terms, and warns when a requirement couldn’t be enforced — so you understand why a stock made the list.
Screen Critic catches the traps
An automatic audit flags value traps, sector overconcentration, and contradictory filters before you act on a result set — a safety net a ratings list doesn’t give you.
FinMav vs Zacks — common questions
What is the difference between FinMav and Zacks?
Zacks is a research firm best known for the Zacks Rank, a proprietary model driven by analyst earnings-estimate revisions. FinMav is a self-directed AI stock screener: you describe the criteria you care about in plain English, and it builds the filters, ranks the matches, and shows exactly how it screened.
Can FinMav replace Zacks for stock screening?
For building your own screens across 3,000+ US companies and 100+ metrics, FinMav replaces the screening workflow and adds plain-English input, transparency, and an automatic result audit. Investors who specifically want Zacks Rank ratings would keep Zacks for that signal.
Is FinMav cheaper than Zacks?
FinMav Pro is $19/month with unlimited screening, and you get 5 free AI queries with no signup and no credit card. Zacks sells paid premium research tiers; FinMav lets you test the full screening workflow before paying anything.
Who should use Zacks instead of FinMav?
Investors who want to follow analyst-estimate-driven ratings and proprietary research — the Zacks Rank, brokerage research reports, and earnings-revision signals — should use Zacks. FinMav is the better fit for investors who want to define and run their own transparent screens.
Five free queries. No credit card. No commitment.
Most investors spend months trying to figure out where to start. You can start right now. If FinMav doesn't earn your trust on your first screen, you haven't spent a thing.
Start screening free